Skip to main content

About this Show

John King USA

News/Business. John King. Daily political news and stories. New.

NETWORK
CNN

DURATION
01:00:00

RATING

SCANNED IN
Annapolis, MD, USA

SOURCE
Comcast Cable

TUNER
Port 1234

VIDEO CODEC
mpeg2video

AUDIO CODEC
mp2

PIXEL WIDTH
720

PIXEL HEIGHT
480

TOPIC FREQUENCY

Washington 19, Christine O'donnell 16, Delaware 10, Us 6, New York 5, Chicago 5, Obama 4, Alaska 4, United States 4, Purina 3, Chris Coons 3, Eric 3, America 3, New England 3, Wilmington 3, John King 3, Elizabeth Warren 3, Tom Davis 3, Rahm Emanuel 2, Jeanne Moos 2,
Borrow a DVD
of this show
  CNN    John King USA    News/Business. John King. Daily  
   political news and stories. New.  

    September 16, 2010
    7:00 - 8:00pm EDT  

7:00pm
i now pronounce you man and hand. >> reporter: stephen, you may say i do, but i don't. >> i will love you forever. hello, stranger. >> reporter: jeanne moos. >> you betcha. >> reporter: cnn. >> you betcha. >> reporter: new york. >> thank you, jeanne moos. thanks very much for watching. i'm wolf blitzer in "the situation room." "john king usa" starts right now. >> thanks, wolf. tea party favorite christine o'donnell is attending a candidates' forum this hour and we hope to bring you a live glimpse of exhibit a in the geopolitical war. the party establishment is nervous to say the least and tonight there's more evidence that leading republican moderates are annoyed at what they see is a harmful purity test from the tea party and its allies. later we'll explore the fault lines on the left, too, jitters
7:01pm
about losing control of congress have democrats squabbling over tax cuts and over how with 47 days left to get their base energized. christine o'donnell and her stunning primary upset tuesday night. not only did she defeat a man who won 12 sometimes statewide, triggered nasty finger pointing within the republican ranks and overtime work for democratic opposition researchers. here to help, former congressman tom davis, former secretary of sta state, stan blackwell and austin, texas, eric ericson. i want to start with this right off the bat. we may drop in if we get a shot of christine o'donnell and get a listen to her. look at this right here, this is the cover of "time" magazine which i think covers pretty good the tensions going on. tea party time, how conservative rebels are rattling the republican establishment. tom davis what is there to be worried about? >> plenty. you have a political establishment in this country in
7:02pm
both parties that hasn't delivered any good news to americans in ten years. they elected obama, firing them and turning on anybody who has been in authority and gummed up the works. >> she has come on the national scene from nowhere in part by copying a tea party message, having a tea party message on the one hand gets people excited, let's listen to her campaigning, talking about all the things wrong with washington. >> i'm optimistic that we can begin the effort to turn the tide in our country, and get our country back on track, but we can't do it by spending our way to recovery and taxing our way to prosperity, but that's exactly what barack obama is proposing. >> that is the tea party message that is catching fire, a lot of independents like that message, they think there's too much spending in washington, that the obama administration is trying to overreach with the power of government. the democrats have been working overtime with the opposition research, here's one clip, christine o'donnell on c-span in
7:03pm
1995. the democrats said this would potentially turn women and independent voters away, discussing why she believes women should not be allowed into the military academies. >> by integrating women into particularly military institutes, it cripples the readiness of our defense. schools like the citadel train young men to confidently lead other young men into a battlefield, where one of them will die and when you have women in that situation, it just creates a whole new set of dynamics, which are distracting to training these men to kill or be killed. >> democrats were gleeful, ken, circulating that all day long, women will run away, independent voters will not support her. >> well, look, this is going to be a national campaign, it's going to be on president obama's push towards expanding the reach of government, the size of
7:04pm
government, and government spending, and pelosi and reid going along with him, hand in glove. she, in fact, has not turned a tin ear to the grassroots of the republican party, the conservative movement or the tea party, and as a consequence, she won a primary. if primaries are to mean anything, it means that people at the grassroots have an opportunity to voice their concern, their direction, and their aspirations. >> primaries are also about ideology and eric ericson, there is a lot of tension in the republican party, people mad at you for stirring up the right flank, and senator demint doesn't think the campaigners are electable and democrats point publicly, why would you go after a guy who has won 12 times statewide, proven he could win that seat and put it into republicans hands and these are her views and voters may embrace
7:05pm
them but the democrats are saying there's no way she can win in a moderate state like delaware. she opposes abortion in all cases, said homosexuality is a chosen lifestyle and is reversible and opposed the ryan white aids care act, she thought federal money should not go to the aids treatment, it should go to cancer research instead. >> you know it's amazing about three weeks ago democrats were saying all the republicans wanted to talk about was the ground zero mosque because they didn't want to talk about the competent and jobs and now the democrats are trying to attack the people on social issues that aren't before the voters in their minds this year or what the candidates are talking about because they don't want to talk about jobs and the economy. sure they can paint her in some sort of crazy way with things she said more than a decade ago, but that can happen with a lot of people. the issue here, though, john, is that even if christine o'donnell loses in delaware, and she may not, she may win, she would be a casualty in a necessary fight on the right that the left has had,
7:06pm
but people care not to talk about it, and if we're going to talk about christine o'donnell all day we might as well talk about alvin greene in south carolina, the minee down there. >> controversial, came out of nowhere, that's one nominee and one race. we have a half dozen senate races that have surprise tea party nominees. >> all ahead in the polls. >> they're all pretty competitive because this year we have, i was joking earlier in the green room with the congressman and ken about, you know, if i showed up at the meeting and said "take me to your leader," who would it be? sarah palin was down at an event raising money for one of those tea party surprises this year, rand paul in kentucky. let's listen. >> those whom i choose to endorse and help support as we head into these midterms where we could take it back, we can take back our country. >> who is her leader? >> right now, we're just getting an organized conspiracy to get
7:07pm
the power back. it's one of these issues where the voters are basically going to put a check on president obama. they're not voting to put republicans in as much as putting a check on that. they don't trust either party, over the last 20 years, both parties have lost market share, more independents are registered and the end result, republicans have curled up into a pretty red ball and democrats into a pretty blue ball and a lot of others have left the parties and participation. >> we're moving towards the most significant change election in quite some time. this is going to be more substantial than 1994 but eric summed it up brilliantly. this is not necessarily a one cycle wave. this can be a two-cycle wave and if that is the case, we're going to see the most substantial gains by any modern day party in two cycles than we've ever seen before. >> i know eric stands on this. we've talked about it for months, he'd rather be in the minority and have people of principle, senator demint said that on the program yesterday.
7:08pm
tom davis you used to help republicans win house seats. >> it's a complex country and you've got to be a broad tent to carry a national coalition. this country reacts to what's on the ground and the tea party and lloy the of republicans are riding on the fact of 9.5% unemployment. as soon as they get in a position of responsibility, the voters say what do you offer and becomes a different test and the wave will sweep conservatives. >> these republicans i'm surrounded by don't take advice from hillary clinton but listen to secretary of state clinton today. she did an interview with abc and asked this question, you have the ideological candidates in both primary, left and right and she was talking specifically about the tea party saying the people may come to washington with pretty firm principles, but then you have to see if they can be pragmatic. >> then when they have the burden of holding office and the responsibility that goes with it, i've seen them become very sobered very quickly. sometimes the poetry can get kind of hot and a little over
7:09pm
the top, but the prose brings you down to earth. >> in a campaign in which the republican message is the democrats have failed to govern responsibly, do you worry, ken blackwell, and quickly to eric, if you bring in these people who, god bless them, have pretty clear views and say washington is a mess and we have to do, you know, joe miller in alaska, maybe get rid of social security for future generations, close the education and energy department. do you worry republicans might take power and be unable to responsibly govern? >> no, i don't, because what the people are saying is that, look, basically government is too big, it is chasing capital out of the marketplace, and we are not growing at a rate to produce jobs. people want to go back to work. these candidates -- >> there are other issues the next congress will have to deal with. >> one of them is not making government bigger which is what barack obama wants to do. it is not ignoring our constitution, which is what the
7:10pm
democrats want to do. this is going to be about putting a check on the growth and intrusion in our government and i think we will find a broad conservative center right coalition that will allow the new congress to do just that. >> i'll ask everybody for a quick time-out. when we come back we'll show you a trend in the republican party that has many of the moderates very, very, very nervous as we go to break we'll show you, a live camera at the candidates' forum up in delaware. christine o'donnell, this event getting under way. she is due to speak, when she does we'll drop in and say hello live. stay with us. [ male announcer ] this is rachel, a busy mom. she starts at dawn and so does her back pain. that's two pills foa four hour drive. the drive is done. so it's a day of games and two more pills. the games are over, her pain is back, that's two more pills. and when she's finally home, but hang on, just two aleve can keep back pain away all day with fewer pills than tylenol. this is rachel, who chose aleve and two pills for a day free of pain. ♪ and get the all day pain relief of aleve in liquid gels.
7:11pm
7:12pm
7:13pm
you're looking at live pictures of the candidates' forum, jewish community center in dover, delaware. among those on hand the two senate candidates, chris coons the democrat, christine o'donnell the republican. you have heard her name before, in wilmington, delaware, excuse me. we'll take you there live when christine o'donnell speaks later. this is not a debate. the candidates give opening statements for several races. let's get back to our conversation about the tea party. is it helpful or harmful to the
7:14pm
republican party at large? i want to bring you up to speed, dana bash, senior congressional correspondent, everyone is talking about the race on capitol hill. she had a conversation with olympia snow, republican senator from maine who told her this "we can't be endangered if you want to be a majority party. it doesn't stand to reason that the republican party would want to exclude moderate republicans if they want to be a majority party. those are mutually exclusive propositions. ideological purity at 100% is a utopian world and i don't know who lives in utopia." yesterday jim demint backed many tea party candidates against establishment republicans. olympia snowor susan collins f they're on the ballot two or four years from now, would you go after them? >> well, we'll have to see what happens after 2010. i want to work with all of my republican colleagues and but we
7:15pm
need to make sure that americans have good choices of people who are focusing on our constitutional responsibilities. >> you go up on capitol hill and these are the conversations happening. that cannot be helpful within the party. >> well it's not. more importantly the kind of wave that the republicans will experience this fall is not a perpetual wave. this is is a one time occurrence. things change in two and four years, for the democrat five straight times to think you'll win tea party candidates up there makes it hard for a lot of areas to be a national party and competitive. this is a high mark and i don't blame conservatives for getting -- >> if republicans campaigned like ronald reagan and get back and govern like jimmy carter they'll be out again. this is not a purity test. this is basically a fidelity test. this is a party that is a pro-life party. this is a party that believes in small government. this is a party that doesn't believe in judicial activism.
7:16pm
that means that should be reflected in their decision-making and when it is not that, confuses and angers and frustrates voters. >> of the issues you listed, pro-choice republican. >> are we a private club or political coalition? >> let me go to the magic wall. >> the issue here is not purity. everyone likes to talk about purity particularly if they're a moderate saying the conservatives will throw them out. conservatives do not rally in illinois to a particular candidate. in california carly fiorina won. in connecticut they went with lin ka mcmahon. massachusetts scott brown. no, the issue is not picking off moderate republicans or liberal republicans in states where conservative probably cannot get elected, it's pushing to the right those candidates in those states where they can. i think if i was a senator from tennessee i would probably be a little worried about the tea party movement. if i was a senator from maine, probably not so much. >> so you make that point, i
7:17pm
want to look at this. this is new york and new england, and we'll go back to 1980, house and senate seats in the united states congress. 1980, 28 republicans from the state of new york and the six new england states. that's 1980. let's come forward to 1992, the number is 25, relatively consistent, you lost a couple in new york and you see that there. 1996, let me come forward, you get back up to 29 in 19 6, even though bill clinton wins reelection. 29 republicans in the united states congress from new york and the new england states in 1996. let me give it a better nudge. 7 today, 7 today and if you come up and look at the summary, she's being finicky today. there we go, 1980 7, today, 4. can you be representative of the northeast if your members can't win? >> well i think on the economic
7:18pm
issues which largely but not exclusively drives a lot of these tea party advocates, you can be in new england. i think republican also do much better in new england this year riding this wave. if it becomes cultural alignments strictly cultural alignments, then i think you're going to be strong in some parts of the country and much weaker in others and that's what we've had the last 15 years, basically cultural alignments not economic. >> how do you manage that eric? >> john, everyone likes to talk about this. it's the very clever talking point that a lot of democrats use. let's do that in the south and see what happened there, where it's gone dramatically to the right and if it weren't for constitutionally mandated racial gerrymandering in the south you'd probably have fewer democrats down there, some by virtue of gerrymandering are locked in. this happens across the country. in the west it's hard for people particularly in the northern and western areas for anyone who is not really libertarian in some places to win. you know, it is cultural. it's happened around the country, happened with movements of people but you know what? there are 50 states you don't
7:19pm
like one, you can get up and move. >> and to eric's point, loyalty is down, independents are up. there is a 50 state incredibly complicated puzzle. are we going to end up with a fractured politics because of regional differences, some party makes it hard when they come to washington to get anything done? >> i don't think so. i really do believe republicans have learned their lesson and that they're going to regain the majority in the house, this time around, maybe the senate but if not this time the next time in the senate and i think they will govern as a cohesive republican party, that center right party that is strong on life, strong on the defense of marriage but more, as important, strong on placing constitutional limits on the reach of government. that is what unites people because basically, collectiveism, rushes people out of the markets, takes over for families and has a disregard for
7:20pm
the religious liberty that has given us the freedom that we have. >> john, let me just say i think racial gerrymandering, eric, has helped the republicans in the south because it packs democrats, african americans and democrats into districts. if you look at what happened after the 1990 census. i mean that would be my observation on this, but there's room for everybody in this party. we have open primaries and the key for us is not for everybody to panic. we need to understand where we are and work together, get the majorities and work it out. >> a quick time-out and keep the trains on time today, eric, thank you, ken and tom thanks as well. when we come back, look around the room right now, look around the room you're in. are there seven people in the room? if that were the united states of america, one person, one in seven in the united states of america are in poverty, according to new government figures. we'll take a closer look when we come back. ot just a warran.um verage everythinge do it's beln it's a yea 50 milpromise. wi complenta schemaintee
7:21pm
and /7 roaide assiance. beusen y ce the st bif, faaronar
7:22pm
7:23pm
7:24pm
republican and tea party favorite christine o'donnell speaking at a candidates' for numb wilmington, delaware, let's listen. >> it's time get common sense ideas, free market ideas back into washington, d.c. i've worked in d.c. for about 12 years, i've been in politics for 20 years. i have enough experience to know how washington works but i have enough real life experience to know how it should work. thank you for your support. >> that's christine o'donnell the republican senate candidate in delaware. we dropped into that event, we were in the break when she started to speak. we'll rewind and bring you more of that later tonight, her first appearance since winning the nomination at a candidates' forum. a new report out from the census bureau saying poverty in the united states is on the rise. we want to show you the numbers here on the magic wall as we come through.
7:25pm
i'm going to play this out, 1959 here, where we are today here. watching the rate, you see the numbers of americans in poverty and the poverty rate in the country, 43.6 million americans in poverty right now, 14% of the population, 43.6 million, 14.3% of the population, essentially the poverty line is if you are an individual $30 a day, imagine that, just imagine that. one of the places i'll walk over this way, braddock, pennsylvania. it's just outside of pittsburgh. used to be a huge steel town. here is braddock in its hey day, the mid 1950s. andrew carnegie built his first steel mill. it was once a booming town, population 20,000. let's take a look at braddock today.
7:26pm
population now down to about 5,000, you see all the closed businesses as you go through it. this is a town where poverty is extraordinary. the median price of a home, of a home is $5,200. the median household income is 17,000. among the people we met was keshia sayles, 31 years old. school bus monitor. she was full of hope as she voted for obama in 2008. listen to the distrust of politicians. >> what about us, the little people? we count, too, but they don't see it, you know, they just worry about themselves. everybody is greedy and selfish, and politicians to me, as an adult, now that i've grown up to
7:27pm
watch and really pay attention, these are the most selfish lying people i've ever seen in my life. >> it's a sad place to visit and you see up close and personal our crew that went in there, just the stunning impact and we saw it last year when we traveled to all 50 states, food banks in places would you never expect them, homelessness reaching to older americans and teenagers as well, one in seven, look around the room, one in seven americans in poverty, according to new numbers out today. when we come back we'll continue our conversation, we'll bring you as well more of christine o'donnell's statement at that forum there and we talked about the divide on the right. we'll also explore divisions on the left. words alone aren't enough.
7:28pm
my job is to listen to the needs and frustrations of the shrimpers and fishermen, hotel or restaurant workers who lost their jobs to the spill. i'm iris cross. bp has taken full responsibility for the clean up in the gulf and that includes keeping you informed. our job is to listen and find ways to help. that means working with communities. restoring the jobs, tourist beaches, and businesses impacted by the spill. we've paid over $400 million in claims and set up a $20 billion independently-run claims fund to cover lost income until people impacted can get back to work. and our efforts aren't coming at tax-payer expense. i know people are wondering-- now that the well is capped, is bp gonna meet its commitments? i was born in new orleans. my family still lives here. i'm gonna be here until we make this right. i just wish that all of the important information
7:29pm
was gathered together in one place. [ printer whirs ] done. ♪ thanks. do you work here? not yet. from tax info to debunking myths, the field guide to evolving your workforce has everything you need. download it now at thinkbeyondthelabel.com.
7:30pm
welcome back. let's check in with joe johns for the latest political news you need to know right now. >> president obama is in connecticut for a pair of fund-raisers appearing with richard blumenthal. the president took a swipe at his republican opponent, former professional wrestling executive linda mcmahon. >> look, there's no doubt i can see how somebody who has been in professional wrestling would think they're right at home in the united states senate. >> before leaving washington, the president thanked the senate for finally passing a $42 billion bill to help small business. the bill now goes to the house. and win or lose, republican
7:31pm
meg whitman's going into the record books, now spent $119 million of her own money on her campaign for california governor, breaking the all-time record set last year by new york mayor michael bloomberg. every single cycle the amount of money the spending goes up. >> how much money are you going to spend? >> about 15 cents. >> i'll vote for you. >> somebody who is going to need some money is christine o'donnell and she has raised since that tuesday stunning upset $850,000, plus that was as of a couple hours ago. we have to check in and get the latest. we have a lot to talk about. first i want to go back, we were in a break when she started speaking at the candidates' forum at wilmington, delaware. let's give you a chance to listen, remember this is the first candidates' forum, not a debate, and she knows a lot of people are saying i can't win in november. she needs to prove them wrong.
7:32pm
>> good evening. my name is christine o'donnell, i'm a candidate in the u.s. senate special election for the seat once held by joe biden. thank you for allowing me to be here tonight. i want to especially thank the jewish community relations center, and all of you for giving me the opportunity to introduce myself to you. there's, it's no secret there's been a rather unflattering portrait of these painted these days and as we go, as we approach the general election over this next month and a half, it's my goal for you to get to know who i am, and why i'm running in this race, and why i'm asking you for your vote on november 2nd. i'm running because i'm concerned about the direction of our country. leaders on both sides of the aisle in washington no longer view our founding principles of limited government, low taxation, our constitutional principles on which this country was founded as indispensable. i want to go down to washington and be your voice.
7:33pm
the issues that we face right now are very complicated and it will be difficult for you to truly know everything that i represent in 60-second sound bites, so over the next couple weeks we're going to be unfolding my platform so that you will know exactly how i am proposing to get the country back on track. i believe that what's coming from washington, more of the same, is unsustainable, as many of you do. our country is going broke. it doesn't take an expert to figure out that we can't continue to spend our way to recovery, nor tax our way to prosperity. >> let's talk about this as we listen to this, she's under attack from democrats and republicans under their breath for social positions she has taken, that is the classic tea party fiscal conservative washington is a mess and both parties are responsible message. that's pretty safe ground. but -- >> well, but you know, there are questions that have been raised by people like karl rove about her credibility as a candidate,
7:34pm
and about her background, and about irs liens against her house and their advice to her is, fess up, tell the truth, you're going to get attacked in a really tough campaign so you might as well get it all out and start defending yourself. i think what we just saw was a good first start for her really, sort of reintroducing herself to the voters, you've heard bad stuff about me. i'm going to talk about policies and we'll see how she proceeds. >> if you want the conservative vote you got to talk like a conservative. a little bit of a news flash i got in my e-mail from the family research council, they say that on friday, it's going to be her very first speech, if you will, before a conservative national gathering since she got through the primary. so you know that's what they want to hear, red meat to conservatives. if you want them to come out and vote for you, you say those things. a lot of these things --
7:35pm
>> but it's delaware. >> right, but a lot of these things that we hear her saying from the '90s or whatever, i mean, these are things that we've been hearing conservatives in some form saying for a long time, so it doesn't come as a complete shock to people inside washington. >> but there's the category of comments she's made about personal sex acts and, which is on the cover of the "new york times," we could probably say the word, but -- >> fire away. >> no, i'll leave it to you. >> okay, nevermind. >> i know, i'm backing down. whatever else, condoms and all of those sorts of things and the character stuff, the allegations she used a campaign debit card to pay for personal expenses that stuff dogged her and that goes to character, what the republican leadership in delaware is very worried about. >> and the republican leadership in washington. it's not just that maybe her ideas aren't necessarily in line with the broader public in delaware, talking to republicans here, that's one of the things they were most concerned about, all of the stories coming out
7:36pm
and being used against her and it is character. if people are angry at washington and feel as we heard from one voter that they're liars and don't understand us, if you hear all of these things about her how does that make her different than people they're mad at? >> if this is the way the tea party movement wants to introduce itself to the american people, because if you're saying we're a new movement, we're a credible movement, here are our ideals and suddenly christine o'donnell is being attacked for all kinds of personal ethics issues, that's not exactly what they want. >> the person we don't hear about is the guy she's running against, chris coons whose whole campaign is how upstanding and ethical he is, balanced the budget, a graduate of divinity school. you're going to have this woman who has questions and squeaky clean on the other side and that's a race. >> he was, chris coons, a week ago considered a sacrificial lamb because they thought mike cassel, who had won 12 times would win the republican nomination and joe biden's seat would be gone. you have an interesting race, it
7:37pm
will be fascinating to watch her try to reintroduce herself. when we come back a lot more to talk about, including what dana was just talking about, the fallout on the hill from all of this, what are republicans and democrats, what are their jitters about the tea party movement? the president is about to please the left. is it enough? stay there. at purina one, we want your dog to be as healthy as possible.
7:38pm
so, we set out to discover the science in some of nature's best ingredients. we created purina one with smartblend. new, delicious shredded morsels and crunchy bites, with real meat, wholesome grains and antioxidants, for strong muscles, vital energy, a healthy immune system, and a real difference in your dog. purina one improved with smartblend. discover what one can do.
7:39pm
7:40pm
among the many challenges facing the president this year, keeping his base, the left
7:41pm
happy, trying to get them to turn out on election day, 47 days from tonight. let's continue our conversation with our correspondents and jessica yellin, you've been tracking elizabeth warren, the consumer protection agency, and would the president name her, even though she's poked the treasury department a little bit, poked the administration a little bit and even though people say could she be confirmed on capitol hill. the administration thinks it has a compromise. is it enough? >> i think no. i will tell you this is very important to progressive groups. they felt let down on the single payer in health care, they felt let down on some of the choices he hasn't made on overturning don't ask, don't tell, other issues. they wanted him to deliver on this. he's split the baby which is given her a job that isn't the big job and they don't really get at this point that it's not the big job. the people i'm talking to think this is a back doorway of letting her run the agency without having to get a confirmation, and that she's going to be in that post for many years to come, and that's
7:42pm
not going to happen, so someday soon in a couple of months he'll nominate someone else, they're not going to be happy. >> i bet that's after the election. >> that's the question. because obama is still the president, obviously still needs those progressives to be backing him, we were talking about this before, big time in 2012. and if they realize afterwards they're mad, they didn't get what they want. jessica is right from the perspective of the senate there's no way she'd be confirmed. >> it also depends how she handles it. it will be interesting to see champion of the liberals. if she comes out and says this is better for me and better for you, then maybe the white house won't have such a problem on its hands. >> if she says i want to leave and someone else should take the job. >> however she's not that dependable that way. she speaks her mind, so we have to see. >> she stirred up so much anger out in the country with her words, talking about the t.a.r.p., for example, but the thing about it, is that when you
7:43pm
look at the t.a.r.p. and the stimulus, they actually did their jobs. >> toxic asset relief program, we like to break down the washington speak here. >> right, right. >> right. >> you look on the right and the left, there's critics on both sides, nonetheless, if these programs hadn't been put in place, most economists agree that this economy would have been in much worse shape. so that's the whole elizabeth warren background to me anyway. >> turn the page as we wait for that tomorrow to another big decision tomorrow, you were up on capitol hill today. christine o'donnell defeated mike cassel. lisa murkowski, senator from alaska got beat by a tea party candidate. is there any way to run as a write-in candidate? >> she's on a plane heading back to alaska, not going to arrive until 6:30 eastern time tomorrow night and make an announcement but we are told from people close to her, from her own lips
7:44pm
today and the leadership they really don't think she's made a decision yet. the bottom line is republican leaders, by the way she was and is a member of the leadership this is the last thing they want is for her to wage her own, you know, write-in campaign because they want to back the republican candidate, they don't want anything at all that could risk keeping that alaska seat in republican hands. >> they have enough to worry about. >> look it was to give you color from capitol hill it was interesting to watch, first day back in the senate today, there was a moment where she was huddled, we could see through the glass window, huddled off the senate chamber with blanche lincoln, another embattled democrat and olympia snowe, talking for 30 minutes and it was pretty clear that they were consoling her. it was very interesting. >> we have to unfortunately end this one here. when we come back, three very, very smart democrats, we'll put them on the hot seat, too, talking about pressures on the left, the civil strive is not just on the right. stay with us.
7:45pm
[ lisa ] my name's lisa, and i smoked for 29 years. the one thing about smoking -- is it dominates your life, and it dominated mine. i honestly loved smoking, and i honestly didn't think i would ever quit. ♪ it was very interesting that you could smoke on the first week. [ male announcer ] chantix is a non-nicotine pill that stays with you all day to help you quit. in studies, 44% of chantix users were quit during weeks 9 to 12 of treatment, compared to 18% on sugar pill. it's proven to reduce the urge to smoke. i did have an unopened pack of cigarettes in my purse... i said, you know, "bye, i don't need you any more, you're not my crutch, i don't need a crutch." [ male announcer ] ask your doctor if chantix is right for you. and find out how you can save money on your prescription at chantix.com.
7:46pm
some people have had changes in behavior, hostility, agitation, depressed mood and suicidal thoughts or actions while taking or after stopping chantix. if you notice agitation, hostility, depression or changes in behavior, thinking or mood that are not typical for you, or if you develop suicidal thoughts or actions, stop taking chantix and call your doctor right away. talk to your doctor about any history of depression or other mental health problems, which can get worse while taking chantix. some people can have allergic or serious skin reactions to chantix, some of which can be life threatening. if you notice swelling of face, mouth, throat or a rash stop taking chantix and see your doctor right away. do not take chantix if you've had a serious allergic or skin reaction to chantix. tell your doctor which medicines you're taking as they may work differently when you quit smoking. chantix dosing may be different if you have kidney problems. the most common side effect is nausea. patients also reported trouble sleeping and vivid, unusual or strange dreams. until you know how chantix may affect you, use caution when driving or operating machinery. chantix should not be taken with other quit-smoking products. ♪
7:47pm
with the chantix and with the support system, it worked for me. [ male announcer ] talk to your doctor about chantix. find out how you can save money on your prescription and learn terms and conditions at chantix.com. affect wheat output in the u.s., the shipping industry in norway, and the rubber industry, in south america? at t. rowe price, we understand the connections of a complex global economy. it's just one reason 75% of our mutual funds beat their 10-year lipper average. t. rowe price. invest with confidence. request a prospectus or summary prospectus with investment objectives, risks, fees, expenses, and other information to read and consider carefully before investing.
7:48pm
we talk a lot about stress on the right with the tea party movement and the republican establishment. what about tensions on the left? here to talk it over, three very smart democrats, stan greenburg, congressman from minnesota, keith ellison and from new orleans, cnn contributor james carville. i want to pop up a study, the results of a study that show the trouble on the left through the primary season, curtis gans on turnout. the average percentage of citizens who voted in democratic primaries was the lowest ever. the average percentage of citizens who voted in the republican primaries was the highest since 1970. congressman ellison, someone who does grassroots politics when you look at that, 35 states during the primaries and you look ahead 47 days, if that holds up you're in trouble >> it won't. i think it's not going to hold up. things will turn around >> how? >> i'm confident because first we'll hit the ground and talk to people but also we're going to talk about a progressive vision for our country, elections are about what's going to happen,
7:49pm
not about what did happen and if the democrats hold onto the house we are going to put in a bill that will help build this country's infrastructure, continue to make it america a manufacturing drive, working on, we're going to make sure that financial products bureau that -- >> i don't mean to interrupt, if the democrats hold onto the house. your number numbers, stan, tell they're not going to. >> numbers are not great, that's true. well, i mean, the issue, you've got to have a conflict and james, i'm sure will tell you how you get a fight. i mean, the best way i've learned when building turnout is to have a fight about something serious, i think we probably all agree on that. a battle for the middle class versus wall street, democrats got to wage that fight, got to fight for american jobs versus outsourcing. they need a fight. >> james first and then the congressman. stan talks about a fight. and you wanted that fight to be in, i've seen stan's polling
7:50pm
numbers, fight on the tax cut issue, 250 and below. when 31 vulnerable and conservative democrats and the speaker send a letter to the president, let's leave them all in place, that muddles the message? >> it does. some of our strategists and it? >> it does. and one problem, we have some of our strategists in the democratic party are called bus boys them say take everything off the table. take it off the table. and the conflict. we have a great idea. let's fly elizabeth warren and that will get everybody excited. like somebody that, you know, what i mean? in washington, oh, yeah, a new consumer protection agency. she is a great woman. really behind us, she help drive it. she will do a great job. if they believe that will get a turnout cranked up, i'm not too sure but i don't think that's going to work. but you do need to have the conflict and they need to get that, looking to put thing on the table. we need waiters to put things on
7:51pm
the table. not bus boys to take thing off. >> among those trying to gin up the turnout is the vice president of the united states. listen to this. this is delicious in many ways. we'll talk about it. >> one reason i want to be on your show is to tell the progressives out there, get in gear, man. there's a lot at stake here. our progressive base, you should not stay home. you'd better get energized. the consequences are serious. for the outcome of the things we care most about. >> i just love at the beginning, one of the reasons i wanted to be on your show. that's on another network. a network that the vice president clearly identifies with progressives. i'll leave it at that for marketing purposes. speaking from the middle here, he is trying gin it up. you say have a big fight. how can the president help -- >> first of all, there is also a
7:52pm
reality. this is, we have 9.5% unemployment and rising. we have poverty rising. our base of young people, you know, the minorities, unmarried women. we have a large base of voters. suburban voters. by the economy. we're in the middle of tough times. we have to try to convince them that they have a stake in this election. we think they do. but i understand, real life goes on. right now the republicans are energized to bring down barack obama them want to see him fail. we obviously have to convince folks, there is something at stake. that's what the fight is about. >> it's interesting that you mentioned poverty and how it could affect politics. the president was asked about this at the news conference. he gave an answer that left a lot of people, the rising tied. this is specifically what we need to do to get the issue of poverty. we have to sharpen the issues and what's at stake here. i like the idea of dealing with
7:53pm
these tax cuts. the republicans want to give tax cuts to bill gates and paris hilton. we've got to say that we need the american people to get something. >> before we go, i want you to listen to a congressman on the program a little while back. and i'm not going to say why i'm playing this. you'll get it. this is a congressman from i think chicago. >> the chairman of the campaign committee, his job was helping the house democrats regain control of congress. not much time in chicago as chief of staff. he is an outside washington hand. he work in washington. and so he has the big money. he has the fame. he has the potentially the charisma and don't get me wrong, he has tremendous strengths he brings to the debate but there are some profound weaknesses and many are very vocal. >> i spent a lot of time with will them. he mentioned they're back in the clinton days. you are rahm emanuel's pollster.
7:54pm
the word is he has asked to you look into his viability. is he right? does he have a lot of problems? >> rahm emanuel makes that decision. he is a local boix he is born and raised there. let's not lose track of that. born and raised there. his family lives, goes to school. this is a guy who will, has unbelievable leadership skills. i don't know what he'll do. >> what are the number suggesting? >> i hope he'll do it. chicago is a great city. he would be a great mayor but i don't know what he'll do. >> tell me what his number say since he won't tell me. >> you know, i look at that for about 60 years in chicago. that's the first time i heard of that. if he gets in, safe to say that he'll be a very viable candidate. but you know, chicago politics is rough and tumble. he is a rum and tumble guy and he'll do fine. it will be a contested election. i think he understands that.
7:55pm
>> we'll let that one go. >> a lot of good candidates. >> thanks again. we'll spend more time in the 47 days until election day. when we come back, we've been talking about this. do you think your taxes are too high? what services should we cut?
7:56pm
down the hill? man: all right. we were actually thinking, maybe... we're going to hike up here, so we'll catch up with you guys. [ indistinct talking and laughter ] whew! i think it's worth it. working with a partner you can trust is always a good decision. massmutual. let our financial professionals help you reach your goals. :tv] [humming] ooh! here we go. announcer: you don't have to be perfect to be a perfect parent, because kids in foster care don't need perfection. they need you.
7:57pm
7:58pm
fact of life in a tough economy. some people complain them want fewer tax. in a hard economy, guess what happens? fewer services like firefighters. so we sent off pete dominick to go out on the street and say in tough time or lower taxes, what would you cut? >> john king, most people understand that tax to go pay for essential services. i suppose we can debate on on how efficiently they do that. i went out and played multiple choice quhark services would they cut? >> no one likes to pay tax. ? where would you lake to cut back? >> the politicians. >> teacher, police, firefighters or sanitation? who are you cutting back on? don't stop. >> sanitation. >> i would like to cut a little
7:59pm
spending on education. >> firefighters, educators, sanitation? >> none. >> police. >> none of them. >> you like all that. a nice car. >> add jobs. >> pay more tax if you have to. >> anything you want to cut spending on? >> yeah. the politicians' salaries. >> i think we pay too many taxes but i think taxes serve a purpose. >> police? >> yes. >> you got a problem with the law? >> no, no. i don't. ♪ go to sleep ♪ >> some of these people that don't do nothing and get paid to do nothing. >> military. yes. we really don't need to be fighting everybody else's battles, i believe. >> i don't feel i should have to pay more tax. i'm happy paying the taxes that i pay. >> i hate taxes. >> what would you cut back on? education, firefighters, police, educators? what would you do? sanitation? >> i would privatize everything. get rid of government. >> john king, john as much as i'm a yankees fan, i don't thin